In reply to wbo2:
> the BBC ? Well that's your opinion..
Exactly. They've contributed to a culture where it's possible to pass off any argument as "well that's your opinion, and mine is equally valid".
A classic example would be putting up Nigel Lawson to "debate" the reality of climate change against a climate scientist, giving false legitimacy to climate scepticism and suggesting that Lawson's idiot opinion is equal to a scientist's deep knowledge. Or in the Brexit "debate", putting up easily confused fools like Andrew Bridgen or Mark Francois against economists or academic. Generally failing to call obvious lies out for what they are, at most claiming they are contested.
More recently, the political editorship is happy to just report whatever the current line is from the government with little or no effort to analyse.