In reply to Robert Durran:
> > It is completely insane that it’s ok to travel for one reason but not the other, especially when the other is far safer in transmission terms.
> You either have guidance/rules or you have a "make your own judgement" free for all. There are good reasons for having the former. And if you have the former, there are going to be inconsistencies.
Indeed. All travelling around creates risk of spread, the more travelling we do, the more we spread. It was decided that work travel was more important than leisure travel, therefore the latter should be stopped first when case numbers rise.
I personally don't much like working, so I put leisure above work in my little world. I can, however, see why the government decided that for the benefit of the nation we should make it the other way round. So I've followed the rules.