In reply to Keith Roughley:
> To be fair to Dunney...he has a mega high first ascent list that has outlasted his peers...including Moffat, Moon, Redhead and I would also include the venerable Dawes...
Ohhh... I love these good ole' classic "who's the best?" arguments - this is what Rocktalk started like before we got on to Palestinian politics and favourite biscuits...
I think there can be little argument about Dunne being Britain's best rock climber of the 1980-90s. But people always compare him to Moon and Moffat. Why? Exceedingly good boulders and sport climbers but not really comparable in terms of Trad climbing. Even Dawes, with the obvious exception of the Indian Face and the Quarryman, was basically a grit specialist.
In terms of hard routes, dangerous routes and "prolific-ness" (if that is a real word) I think the people he should be compared to the unsung heros of UK climbing like John Arran (with an Alpine rock/big wall record to rival anyone in the UK and most outside of it) , Martin Crocker (many repeats of Total Eclipse? I think not), Nick Dixon (why isn't Face Mecca celebarated in the way that the Indian Face is?).
But as to the new king of UK climbing - Birkett or Macleod? Macleod seems to be having the problem that Dunne had for years - that no one can be arsed to repeat his hard routes.