In reply to Ian McNeill:
>
> [...]
>
> Why would you want to tie a knot in a perfectly good sling?
In this case I did it to "snug" the sling up against a slight depression in the back of the spike, as I wasn't sure that it wouldn't slip off otherwise.
As I said above, I wasn't happy with it anyway, and so immediately clipped into an additional nut as soon as I could arrange one.
> It is something I see all the time(I dont do it) I can never understand what this achieves or enables. I ask people why they do ? but no plausable safe reasoning as to why.
I was taught that if you have, say, a doubled long sling and knot the centre, you then get 2 pairs of independent loops. I've you're over a spike or similar, the sling is weighted and the rock cuts through one sling, then the fact that you've knotten it means that the doubled loop doesnt't just slide off the spike under your weight.
admittedly it's not a situation that's likely to occur, but if knotting a doubled overhand gives you that extra (small) margin, then "why not do it?". If we now find out that knotting a sling actually decreases the safty margin, then that's a very good reason *not* to do it.
> I personally would chose a different size sling if I though it would help.
So would I...if I had one.
> If the problem is tying an over hand to shorten a sling around a spike - reassess you belaying stance.
I did, on this occasion. Quickly knotted and clipped to the spike, then reassessed and got onto a nut as well.
> I wonder if the same applies to the old overhand knot for multiple anchor linking method ?? Have tests been done on this which is more common pratice.
Dunno...I brought this thread up in the hope that someone might know what tests were done and how they came out, as something heard over a curry in North Wales, while from a source trusted by my eating companions, might have been prone to a misunderstanding somewhere along the line!