In reply to Richard J:
Part 2 of my reply:
>I took a look again at your book last night (which I like a lot, I should say, and I account for two sales because I gave one to my father too), and it does strike me that you seem to have a very hostile view of the Anglo-Saxons and a very romantically positive view of the Britons. Being Welsh I don't of course take any offense at this, but it does seem odd to me that the English seem to hold their ancestors in such disregard.
>
Oh, dear. It is true that the book, being in effect a potted history of the Peak, simplified and over-dramatised the story; but I stand by most of my comments, and I wanted to make it as balanced as possible, and not just to give a totally one-sided 'glorious English' view. I'll come back to that shortly.
>One specific point in your book that does seem very arguable is the suggestion that it was the Anglo-Saxons who brought Christianity to the Peak (allowing you to couple your very hostile attitude to christianity with a negative view of the Anglo-Saxons). But the best evidence for the late survival of a British statelet in the Hope Valley region is the existence of the Eccles place name element, which means church (latin ecclesia, welsh eglwys).
Yes, this was a definite over-simplification. However ...
There is no doubt that Christianity first came to the Peak in a very gentle, humanist, Pelagian way in late Roman times (Pelagius himself rejected completely the idea of 'Original Sin'), and that a very strange form of it - a hybrid of pagan fertility rights and the new Xtian idea of 'redemption of sins' - persisted in a few areas in Romano-British times at the end of the Roman occupation, up to the arrival of the (pagan) Anglo-Saxons. As you say, Eccles points to such areas: particularly the Ecclesbourne valley, just south of Wirksworth.
There is, however, extremely little evidence that anything resembling Augustinian christianity existed in any wide scale way. It seems more to have been an indulgence of the Roman aristocracy, and the well-educated. The clergy were in effect new style Druids, "wizards strengthened by the power of a Deity mightier than the ancestral gods". (Morris, Age of Arthur, p.374)
There seems to have been no widespread conversion to Christianity until after the Synod of Whitby in 664, and the establishment of Wilfred in York. Mercia under King Penda was staunchly pagan, but his son Paeda became a Christian when he married the daughter of the Northumbrian King Oswy (the Northumbrian Royal Family having converted to Xtianity in 627). Paeda then came to Repton with four monks, one of whom, Diuma, became the first Bishop of Mercia in about 655.
Just what a strange form of Christianity it was at this time can be seen from a number of archaelogical remains. The Benty Grange helmet (thought to date from shortly after Christianity came to Mercia in 655 shows contradictory Christian and pagan emblems - a silver Latin cross, and a boar, sacred to the god Freyr); and the Wirksworth stone (in one of the earliest Christian churches in the Peak district), thought to be the coffin lid of the monk Betti, who came to Repton with Paeda appears to contain a number of pagan symbols as well as overtly Christian imagery.
Just how far Christianity spread in the Peak beyond the main monastic centres is very much open to question. All the evidence is that ancient pagan practises continued in many villages well into the 17th century and the arrival of Wesleyanism. Even then the Peakrils of Matlock Bath (so splendidly described by Daniel Defoe, on his 'Tour') stubbornly resisted it. I quote one in my book: "Why do you talk thus of Faith? Stuff, nonsense!" The area around Hathersage and Castleton particularly remained a refuge of Catholicism and paganism for many centuries (and indeed, all kinds of dissenters, renegades and revolutionaries.)
One of the best accounts of the survival of pagan traditions is Pennethorne Hughes 'Witchcraft' (Pelican), in which he argues that there was a 'widespread survival of palaeolithic emotive religion ... the royal households might be Christian, but the people were pagan.' (pp.50-51)
>it does seem odd to me that the English seem to hold their ancestors in such disregard.
>
Not the case at all. Just, as I say, a case of trying to paint a balanced picture, considering always how it might have appeared to the indigenous people rather than the invader. I myself am a mixture of Anglo-Saxon, Irish, Italian and Swiss (ie. about 90 per cent Anglo-Saxon but with some Celtic and Romanch streaks in there too!) If you are interested, my father has written a very detailed, 528-page, history of our family: 'Not Found Wanting [that's the family motto!]: a history of the Stainforths, an Anglo-Saxon Family'. I have just made a website about it:
www.stainforth-history.co.uk