In reply to SecretSquirrel:
> (In reply to Jon Barton)
> If they can't source high quality recycled paper that is cost effective for them to keep the magazine free then thats a separate issue and I don't think anybody would critise them for that.
That is the dilema that Alpinist faced until they got Patagonia to underwrite the costs.
"Magazine production in the US results in the logging of more than 35 million trees per year. Deforestation releases carbon dioxide, one of the main causes of global warming. Magazines that end up in landfills give off methane, another major greenhouse gas, as they decompose.
Alpinist has been fortunate since our start to publish a magazine our readers want to hold on to. More than 90% of Alpinist readers keep their back copies, by far the highest percentage of any climbing magazine. But this by itself wasn’t enough, so in Spring 2006, Alpinist’s Issue 15 became the first climbing magazine to be published on 50% recycled, total chlorine-free paper, using sustainable forestry for the remaining paper. Coupled with our archival-quality production values, our Earth Ink Sustainable Publishing program made us the outdoor industry’s first sustainably published magazine.
Then we got the printer’s bill. Ouch. As much as wanted to, our little climbing company couldn’t afford the more than $6,000 per issue recycled content paper added to our costs. Our ideals took a back seat to hard economic reality, and we spent the next six months looking for a partner progressive enough to support our return to our ideals.
In the middle of August, 2006, Patagonia stepped in. They signed on as our Earth Ink partner, allowing us to get back to recycled content at an even higher percentage than we had used before. Starting with Issue 18, Alpinist is publishing on 100% recycled paper. Together with our archival quality, we’re once again right where we want to be: preserving the places of our inspiration even as we celebrate them in print."
http://www.alpinist.com/p/earth_ink