In reply to Martin Davies - KCLMC:
Most of these votes are constitutional and legal requirements and there is little point in voting Against. For example, if the Auditors weren't approved, then what - The BMC would have to go and find someone else to do it. Subs are usually a bone of contention, but this year are being frozen, which is the same result as would happen if they were rejected.
The only point in voting Against any of the proposal is to register your disapproval in the way the BMC is being run, but it's a bit of a vague gesture.
I suppose if any of the votes were rejected, the BMC might be forced to hold an EGM, as happened a few years ago when the clubs rejected the subs, but surely it has got better things to do.