In reply to Cragrat Rich:
> (In reply to victim of mathematics)
>
> You're getting a little uptight, despite suggesting that's what I was doing.
>
I never said I wasn't uptight, just that you were...
> Few questions :
>
> Is it ok for me to think it's annoying and rubbish when people go dishing out a load of beta about climbs, uselessly based only on their own perspective anyway?
>
Yes it's OK. It's really tedious, but it's OK (although if it's so subjective as to be useless then what's the problem?).
> Is it ok for me to express that via a post?
>
Yes it is. Nobody will give two hoots, but that's fine.
What isn't fine is you whittering on incessantly and impressing your own extremist onsight views on everybody at every possible opportunity, as you do on a regular basis. If somebody asks for route recommendations, it's a damn sight more illuminating if people add a little flavour of the routes they are recommending, rather than just list some good routes. Whether this be the general style of the route (a recommendation of some excellent crack climbs would be totally unhelpful to some weirdy slab-merchant) or even just some superlatives about how ace the route is. I accept that sometimes people can over-enthuse to the point of possibly giving away a very small amount of beta, although I'm not sure that anything said on this thread couldn't be gleaned from either the guidebook, or just by looking at the routes themselves, but only a really grumpy onsight-fascist would get quite so annoyed about it. As I said, this is especially pointless since you didn't even start the thread and are putting opinions and words into the OP's mouth.
> and...
>
> Why did you get so irate?
I'm always irate, but you have a particularly illustrious history of talking complete and utter codswallop. I imagine much of this is as part of some 'comedy' internet persona, but it's getting unimaginably tired now.