In reply to ksjs:
> (In reply to victim of mathematics) Disagree on the polish, gear and reading: polish rarely has any effect on the climbing, gear is often bombproof (Pembroke and Pen Twryn for example) and I actually think it can be easy to read (not to mention that where holds are small and sequences inobvious you can nearly always 'stand' on something or clutch at some small edge and on the continent (Spain, Kalymnos) you don't get anything that's easier to read onsight than their limestone at times - buckets!)
>
If you think that polish has no effect on the climbing then you've clearly never been to Stoney (which I actually have a bit of a soft spot for), or Wintour's Leap, or Farleton , or any number of other limestone crags. It certainly makes some moves harder, and also (and maybe more crucially for me) it makes climbing on it a damn sight less pleasant.
The gear at Pembroke is generally pretty good, but that's not true for inland limestone, which tends to have those annoying cracks which take any number of shonky nuts, but no reassuring ones.
And I still totally disagree about it being easy to read. I find this especially true of quarried limestone where from below you have no way of knowing whether a hold is going to be a brilliant sharp crimp or a less-than-useless sloper. I don't get your point about always being able to stand on something while you work it out. Surely that's true on any kind of rock? As limestone climbing is often steeper and pumpier, that makes the situation even worse (admittedly especially so if you're a fat punter like me).
> Some of my best climbing experiences have been on limestone as I'm sure is the case for many others. I agree it maybe doesn't have the character of other types / venues but it can still be utterly brilliant. It just sounds like you've got a bit of a chip on your shoulder to be honest.
You appear to do a lot of sports climbing, which in this country means you must like limestone, since if you didn't there's not a great deal of scope for you to climb anything. So I think it's you who's being a bit one-eyed about it. But, I'm not trying to convince you that you're wrong (you have every right to be wrong), I'm just trying to explain to you why I don't share your viewpoint.
And by the way, what do you think it means to have a chip on your shoulder about a rock type? Do you think I was beaten by Kilnsey in the 100m at school sports day, or that Malham swindled me in a game of poker once? It seems a rather bizarre choice of words.