In reply to Bruce Hooker:
> In the process the country has been wrecked, tens of thousands of Libyans have died, far more than Gaddafi killed in 40 years, at best bombed, at worst tortured to death by racist thugs.
You don't actually know how many people died, because no one does. The claims of 25-30,000 come from the now transitional government, i.e. the rebel side, because they claimed the Gaddafi loyalist forces killed so many civilians. Most international organisation don't put much trust in these claims though. But let's just accept that terrible things happen in civil wars and ask why it started? UN Resolution 1970 from February 11,
before the war had started, might help remind you:
"Expressing grave concern at the situation in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and condemning the violence and use of force against civilians,
Deploring the gross and systematic violation of human rights, including the repression of peaceful demonstrators, expressing deep concern at the deaths of civilians, and rejecting unequivocally the incitement to hostility and violence against the civilian population made from the highest level of the Libyan government,
Welcoming the condemnation by the Arab League, the African Union, and the
Secretary General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference of the serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law that are being committed in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya,"
I guess though if all the protesters were just "mercenaries" and "racist thugs" (the irony of your fixation on this in the light of the Gaddafi regimes systematic terrible treatment of migrants - sometime at the behest of the EU and Italy - over the last ten years leaves a very unpleasant after taste), gunning them down was what they deserved?
> The whole of N Africa has been destabilised by the floods of arms dumped in the area - Mali is just one,
You're having a laugh here I suppose. Because Gaddafi's regime had so obviously been a source of stability and peace over the last 30 years in the Sahel/Sahara. Not.
> I suppose this is one in a line of successes, Yugoslavia,
Yes, having Milosovic as agent was just a masterful move by "NATO".
> Iraq,
Which you supported.