In reply to UKC News: In regards to the second video with Sherpa Pemba Janbu, it is refreshing to hear the opinion of someone directly involved with leading and working at high altitude though a couple of things made me think.
"Climbers actually say, "I've paid $50,000. You are here to work for me, and you have to accompany me," in response to such suggestions.
So then I have to put my life at risk and continue the climb because of the client's insistence."
Surely every client will at some point eventually back down after meeting a consistent wall of authority saying 'you are going no further'. If someone decides to up and go on by themselves despite hearing those warnings, how much responsibility does the company/ Sherpa have from that point onwards?
"Also, the mountain itself is losing its value.
Just about everyone seems to want to climb it by paying a Sherpa who will ensure reaching the summit."
Is this a hint that the people themselves who rely upon the income generated from high altitude work would like to see a rise in 'alpine style' or unsupported attempts? Is it ethical to deny people work as a result of attempting a route or summit in a 'clean' fashion?
A video of Kenton Cool on his tenth ascent of Everest and a video interview with sherpa Pemba Janbu.
