In reply to SCC:
> Could you not say that about any treatment you receive?
On a case by case basis yes, that's the problem. The solution is properly designed and executed and scrutinised tests, something your average hospital treatment/medicine will have been subject to. Something your average alternative therapy will not have been subject to despite appearances and protestations to the contrary.
Brightly colored kineso tape appears to fall into this inconclusively tested category. That said, I'm sure sports psychologists love it, it appears to be a sticking plaster for the mind more than the thigh/back/hip/arm. Just because it likely does nothing doesn't mean it's useless
> A lot of people (not aimed at you btw) seem very ready to dismiss new ideas / approaches and belittle or ridicule those that say something has worked for them.
I'm not mocking anyone. It just irritates me to see people being conned, willingly or otherwise.
> If the treatment is dangerous then fair play - ridicule away. But if it's not, and people find that it helps them, so what?
It's not quite that simple. What about where an ineffective quack 'treatment' prevents someone from seeking a proven effective treatment?
Personally I also think there's a wider problem in not challenging anti/non scientific quackery, it's a backward step and one that's potentially very dangerous when you look at some of the larger problems facing our societies like climate change and increasing competition for finite food/water/mineral/energy. Quackery and religion aren't going to solve these problems though they'll no doubt offer to, if they can be dealt with we'll need to be rational and objective as a group, individuals can't do it alone.
jk