In reply to EeeByGum:
From the analysis on radio 4 (the source of all reliable information) The scientists in question said that experiencing tremors does not mean that there will definitely be a large earthquake but they couldn't be certain stating that the place is located on area of high seismic activity. whereas, the local bloke without the science background said that the tremors were a good thing as they were acting as a moderator, releasing the pressure in a controlled manner. This second opinion is exactly that an opinion and has not proper scientific basis.
What this bloke said is what screwed them over.
My opinion on this is divided, he was in a position of responsibility and he messed up, potentially contributing to the deaths of 300 people so he should be severely reprimanded for it. The scientists on the other hand didn't say anything that was not fact, I can't see how you can prosecute someone for stating scientific fact.
I imaging the next time anyone is hosting a press conference requiring scientific input they will struggle to find people to take part.
If the people had screamed from the rooftops "panic, panic, there's an earthquake coming" and then nothing had happened they'd probablly be being hauled over the coals anyway.