In reply to needvert:
> (In reply to The New NickB)
> [...]
>
> He didn't rob any great athletes of their livelihoods any more than any winner robs a loser.
If he cheated, which he did, he robbed them.
>
> Though perhaps I'm wrong, and various pro cyclists have been living homeless and starving because they couldn't win the tour de france because lance was always in front.
Not homeless and starving so OK, hmm.
> I have to admit to being as outraged about this as I would with someone having covert
plastic surgery winning a natural beauty contest. That is to say, I don't see what the big deal is. (Especially given the prevalence of performance enhancing drugs in climbing.)
It very sad that you don't see cheating as an issue.