In reply to escudoturbo:
> (In reply to OneLifeOneHeart) look in any fishing magazine or along the banks of any lake or river at a weekend and you will see almost all whites; attend an inner inner-city boxing club and you will find the opposite. This no dobt applys to many other sports and to try an cover the full scope of reasons here would be futule but some of the main ones are no doubt accesability, role-models, image, geography and economics.
....best answer I think, -so many multi-factorial reasons embedded in history, sociology, current society and personal differences, it's oddly both an interesting question, and a trivial one. No, Not 'trivial' - that implies 'very simple', but more of a 'is there any point asking'-type question. I mean, is it a problem that needs solving?
I agree climbing's actually pretty inclusive, and in any case it doesn't seem an anomaly compared to, say, sailing, cycling, rowing, fencing - all probably traditionally regarded as well-off gentlemanly pursuits, even if inexpensive. Football and boxing were always more traditional outlets for youths of working class in urban areas, hence unsurprising that non-caucasians are highly represented.
Fishing and swimming, now those stand out to me - anyone shed any light? Does buying a rod make you racist?