In reply to OMR: In reply to OMR: I tried to reply to this last night but you had second thoughts about what was a pretty offensive and patronising post and pulled it. Thanks for that. However my reply was lost. Anyway I did "talk to somebody about it" - a mate who spends a fortune on bothy renovation and a factor.
Please don't go down the secrecy red herring route. Of course you can talk about it, but please understand that this is a route to damage and possible loss of the building. There is a difference between secrecy and "not advertising". This article is a misguided attempt to advertise a well looked after place whose maintainance is dependant on it being little used. It is very harmful.
There is no recognition in the article of the hard work and money put in, just an assumption that a building is just there, just there to be used. People who maintain these buildings privately do not have the resources of the MBA behind them and cannot take the work that promotion brings.
The MBA is not the only route - just as well given "standards". There is room and a need for both but care needs to be taken. This is not a turf war, some landowners are wary of the MBA for whatever reason, so these are bonus bothies. The fact that the structure and interiors are largely preserved is a big bonus now too and important.
As for bitterness - I personally invested a lot of time and money in a similar place only for it to be closed because the owners were fed up with heavy usage and online advertising. Many non MBA howffs have gone in my lifetime, abuse is a common cause of loss.
There are no secret bothies, this one has even been on the front cover of the Scots Magazine - knowledge has always been passed around by word of mouth and over modern communications. Advertising is another thing altogether.
Did the OP think of the owners when he advertised staying in somebody elses house?