In reply to johncoxmysteriously:
> (In reply to owlart)
>
> I thought it had the potential to cause alarm and annoyance (and indeed did), that the man was a prat, and that being fined £385 wasn't exactly going to ruin his life, yes. I don't think in general that the freedom to make airport-bombing jokes is one we should greatly value.
>
> But sure, it's different. It's not *that* different, though. Maybe this gentleman thought his comments were obviously a joke?
The High Court agreed with him too, since they overturned his conviction.
> Are things criminal or not according to how well the poster's sense of humour aligns with that of the world?
I don't know, would you support an RSPCA investigation into Darren Jackson's postings on here? Or maybe Rubbishy's tapir bothering should be prosecuted too?