In reply to snoop6060:
> (In reply to highclimber)
>
> My missus used to work for google selling adwords campaigns, she was very much in leeds. And her pay was primarily based on the amount of revenue she brought in from clients. IN fact she could earn multiple times her salary in bonuses based entirely on how much money she brought in.
>
> So basically, they are talking utter bollocks.
Oh my! What a surprise. In common sense, conceptual terms they are bullshitting, and it is legal.
Working the tax system requires a specific kind of dishonesty, commonly known as "bending the rules". No it isn't illegal, yes, it is the government's fault not Google's (etc), but it always makes me smile the way certain people on here bother to construct arguments that make a pathetically weak attempt to say that this form of dishonesty is not what it is. It's inescapable: it's bending the rules; it is incompatible with honesty and integrity.
If you need it broken down further, honesty involves following the spirit of the law not just the letter of the law. Honesty understands the policy intent and acts accordingly, rather than seeking to undermine the policy intent to ones own advantage but to the detriment of the public interest. Should we rely on honesty to collect taxes? No! We should have robust policies and enforcement.
As for the ISA crap, I've explained already but here it is again. The government is in charge of taxation and have created a policy with the
intent of allowing a specific sum to be saved by an individual tax free. So when I take out an ISA I'm following the policy intent. When Google bend the rules, they are bending the rules. One is honest behaviour, one is dishonest. Both are legal.
Bad policy fails to deliver the policy intent. Dishonest organisations exploit bad policy, and we should expect them to.