In reply to Shone:
> (In reply to Jim C)
> Jim,
>
>
> On the net there are lots of discussions about electric being 100% efficient at point of conversion..
Indeed, that is the point I was making, they focus on the 100% efficiency ( at point of conversion) but the cost of creation is where the expense is added as it is so inefficient to create/convert the largely coal fuel to the more convienient electricity. You are never going to recover that costbthrough any kind of 'efficiency'
It is a bit like marketing a Mars bar Lite, with a tiny amount less fat , and sugar than the original.
They are correct it is Lite ( in comparison) and they get to talk about the good aspects, and ignore the elephant in the room.
The Elephant in your room is electic heating is expensive to start with compared to other options , so the 100% efficiency is irrelevant .