In reply to Sircumfrins:
Right...I'm infront of a keyboard now and am waiting for dinner to cook. Now to address
28 Signs That The West Coast Is Being Absolutely Fried With Nuclear Radiation From Fukushima By Michael Snyder because I find bullshit entertaining.
1. Polar bears, seals and walruses along the Alaska coastline are suffering from fur loss and open sores
From the linked article: "Reuters noted that preliminary studies do not support a theory that the disease is due to contamination from the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan."
2. There is an epidemic of sea lion deaths along the California coastline
Extremely poorly written article with dead links. Appears to suggest a conspiracy involving the US government (with both the CDC and the FDA involved).
3. Along the Pacific coast of Canada and the Alaska coastline, the population of sockeye salmon is at a historic low. Many are blaming Fukushima.
The linked article actually says "Kotyk said department scientists don’t know why the return numbers are so low.", there is no mention of anyone blaming Fukushima or radiation.
4. Something is causing fish all along the west coast of Canada to bleed from their gills, bellies and eyeballs.
The linked article mentions suspicion that its due to a pathogen (possibly viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus), no mention of radiation.
5. A vast field of radioactive debris from Fukushima that is approximately the size of California has crossed the Pacific Ocean and is starting to collide with the west coast.
There's no vast field of radioactive debris mentioned in the blog post. There is concern expressed by some that there is the possibility of some debris being radioactive.
6. It is being projected that the radioactivity of coastal waters off the U.S. west coast could double over the next five to six years.
Quote from the linked article: "The total peak radioactivity levels would then be about twice the pre-Fukushima values. “While this may sound alarming, these levels are still lower than those permitted for drinking water,” said Böning."
7. Experts have found very high levels of cesium-137 in plankton living in the waters of the Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and the west coast.
The article does not mention cesium-137. It's titled "Researchers find high cesium in some Pacific plankton", it then discusses cesium-134.
8. One test in California found that 15 out of 15 bluefin tuna were contaminated with radiation from Fukushima.
Link is a blog post again (same blog as before, washingtonsblog.com).
"15 bluefin caught in August, five months after the meltdowns at Fukushima Daiichi, all contained reactor byproducts cesium-134 and cesium-137 at levels that produced radiation about 3% higher than natural background sources"
3% more than natural background sources...OK. This one is at least honest. But alarmist by not mentioning the trivial degree of contamination.
9. Back in 2012, the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being found in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to Canada
Linked article starts off with "After the world's worst nuclear accident in 25 years, authorities in Canada said people living here were safe and faced no health risks from the fallout from Fukushima" then later "The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which monitors food safety, says it is aware of the numbers but says the amounts of cesium detected are small...".
There are some counter positions mentioned in the article (the first being by a family physician, later on by an anti-nuclear advocate. Not overly convincing stuff.)
I was expecting some weak evidence...But I'm amazed at just how bad that page is. It's dishonest and manipulative.