In reply to Tom Valentine:
> I am sorry that you find my comparisons inappropriate.
> I was merely trying to point out that people who are POSITIVE about what is right and wrong would more than likely have had to make an adjustment to their moral compass if they had lived in different times.
That's a fair point, it's just that, having thought through whether it can really be seen as immoral or not, after seeing posts on here by religious people saying they think it is, I decided that somebody has to come to harm for questions about whether it's immoral to start being asked, and realised that this means gays and lesbians can't in any sense be seen as being immoral.
Moral relativism only exists where harm occurs, I think, where as, for something to be seen as immoral where no harm occurs at all, is just simply illogical. One might as well say bouncing a tennis ball is.
I spent quite a while wondering about the few religious people on here thinking to be gay is immoral, and they're just not thinking things through for themselves.
When Oscar Wilde was jailed, you can bet he'd have had some male and female friends who were on his side, even if societal norms went against him.
Where there is something which harms other people in some way, if indirectly, I get your point.
Post edited at 18:34