In reply to Choss:
> (In reply to Shani)
>
> [...]
>
> You Meat eaters are so Angry and aggressive Arent you
There is not anger and no intention to appear aggressive - what you put is simply bollocks as in 'untrue'. If you deemed it angry you are wrong. If you deemed it aggressive, I apologise.
> Actually theres as much stuff Supporting and refuting this, choose your side..,
I guess even if it was true then meat must rot and clog the guts of all meat eating animals like bears, sharks and big cats.....which doesn't pass the smell-test to me. But if you can provide evidence then I am happy to learn something new.
>
> Arable farming doesnt need to be monoculture, it can be very diverse, for instance Island growing, Means more Productive per area, generates its own fertiliser every year so self fertile organic, Drought and cold Resistance...
But arable farming particularly in the West IS largely monoculture. All productive and verdent natural ecosystems have flora and fauna in place. If we compete with the fauna for the flora, we have to control the fauna.
> That diversity increases local Biodiversity, and food production, tested and Proven in Peru, fact.
An acre of farmland up at Stanage on which sheep graze is way more biodiverse than the acres of arable land just a few miles away. Pastoral farming means we don't compete with animals at the base of the food chain and so the land can support a more complex ecosystem and numerous ecological niches.
> If crops grown to wastefully and needlessly feed to farm animals were switched to growing for human consumption, the amount of Land Taken out of animal pasture and the reduction in Arable Land needed would Mean we could Turn 50% plus of farmland Back over to Nature. Fact!
I am not sure how large hte problem is of growing crops exclusively for farm animals is. Certainly with your last point you'll need to back this up with evidence for me to comment.
I see you haven't disagreed that veg*ism pushes the killing to where it can't be seen.