In reply to DubyaJamesDubya:
> You miss the point. Mr McCleod is actually pushing an 'I want more bolted climbs and I'm a lazy F. pr*t' agenda. The 'trad climbing is SOOO EXPENSIVE!!!' comments are just part of the campaign.
It must be nice for that to be a convenient argument for you .Not sure if the 'F.' is 'fat' or 'f-ing' though? It would be nice to get clarification. Actually my contribution to this thread was spurred entirely by the argument that trad is not much more expensive than sport, which is clearly by any fair comparison.
I have a lot of student friends. For most of them the cost of a trad rack is generally pretty difficult to manage, while most can generally manage a rope if they are keen. This, and my previous comments in this thread, would seem to be fair on a thread talking about the decline of trad where the relative costs has been discussed as a factor?
Off-topic response (since I have been accused on being on a campaign):
The fact that as the climbing world stands at the moment there will be more bolted climbs in the future, regardless of what you or I want. There are, as I have always argued, extremely good arguments against bolting in some cases - indeed the default should be not to act unless certain. Sadly these are not usually the arguments that the sport-is-crap religious trad zealots (fortunately a minority, even on UKC).
For the avoidance of doubt, any of the following 'arguments' are not arguments in favour of not bolting; they are either just denigrating other people, ignorant, or daft:
- 'convenience climbing'
- the 'fast food' argument
- only trad is 'true' climbing
- 'bolting down to your level'
- any semantic debate about 'bolted climbing' vs 'sports climbing'
- I'm sure I've missed a few...
Any of these may potentially trigger a response from me, not because I am on some campaign to retrobolt everything, but because they are stupid arguments.
From the view of someone fairly new to climbing who does a bit of everything, they give trad a bad name. If your one of your major arguments against sport is that it is 'lazy' (assuming your insult against me is related to your bolted climbing comment) then you aren't going to win any friends amongst the mythical 'sports climbers' (NOT A REAL SPECIES). People have made mistakes when bolting stuff before, but by and large I think, due to reasonable compromises and debate, the current state of affairs is pretty reasonable.
Bolt the grit? No. Bolt the Dartmoor tors? Of course not. Bolt the UK mountains? Generally not. Bolt some new unclimbed crag? Not necessarily, depends on the context. Bolt some crappy crack line in some crappy entirely grid-bolted quarry? Maybe? Every case just needs to be taken individually with reasonable consideration or debate, then everyone (well, most people) can get on :P
I also recognise that UKC is not the real world :P and my arguments on here should be viewed in light of that - they are responses to other comments made on here. If I think some of those arguments are crap I will say so - that doesn't mean I will, being enraged by the discussion, grab a drill and start putting holes in the grit :P
So perhaps I am on a campaign - a campaign against stupid arguments :P
Post edited at 11:03