In reply to innes:
> Hi Jim,
> Interesting discussions. A good glue-in bolt seems pretty hard to shift then?
> From experience, I've no doubt that glue-in bolts last far, far longer than mechanical/expansion bolts and are possibly better for other reasons too. But, recently I've seen some interesting videos about techniques to remove mechanical bolts that seem to allow reuse of the holes, possibly indefinitely? Is this really possible, or is it BS in reality?
> Jim, in the looong-term, what’s your view about sustainable bolting? Why not mechanical bolts, which don’t last as long but could be ‘managed’ by planned replacement, rather than glue-ins which seem to require destructive removal, or chopping and then a poor attempt at camouflage?
> I know managed bolt ‘replacement’ doesn't currently happen (though some local bolt funds can do a reasonable job of bolt ‘substitution’) but I’m talking about the long-term and things could/will change, no? This seems to be a simple(but not easy?) question of engineering a reasonably long lasting but wholly removable bolt technology?
> Is this possible? Is a removable ‘legacy bolt’ <ahem> just a pipe dream if we want decent, i.e certified, holding power?
> PS in medium term I really like twisted leg glue ins
I´m involved to a certain amount in the re-bolting stuff in the USA but not all you see tells the whole story. As a generalisation the mechanical bolts you can (relatively) easily remove are ones that haven´t suffered badly from corrosion, ones that a rusted to death usually just break off when you try to remove them. This is probably going to be the case with Legacy bolts the same as all the others, once corrosion has got into the thread/cone junction it´ll sieze up and snap off when you try to get it out. Basically a lot of the time if you can remove them you didn´t need to.
The same with glue-ins, most you can just pull out but those are the ones that don´t break so why replace them?
The sleeve-type bolts favoured by the Americans are not popular in Europe for good reasons and I personally am not a fan of relying on a bolt whose holding power is determined by the torque preload the bolt has on the day I use it. Wedge bolts are fit and forget which appeals to me!
Climbers want bolts to stay in the rock, having them removable is actually easy so long as the installers don´t mind drilling bigger holes and paying more. Currently these are two things installers don´t like.
The way bolting is organised and funded at the moment any concept of rolling maintenance schedules is a pipedream, even countries like Germany where there is an organised commitment to fund and maintain bolts the choice is glue-ins anyway and given their lifespan compared with rock-climbing in general it seems pointless to look too far forward. Cheap flights to Kalymnos will probably not exist in 50 years time so worrying about bolts lasting after that is a bit pointless in many ways, in fact looking at the history of trendy sport climbing areas in Europe there is a high probability that in 20 years time Kalymnos for example will be a half-abandoned wasteland and we´ll have moved on to somewhere new.
Since the inexorable rise in standards will have made the majority of routes in Europe beginners routes they will all need rebolting to climbing wall standards anyway.
The biggest improvement to bolt life and replacement is for climbing to organise a much stronger community involvement to raise the finance so that new routes are bolted using suitable material and so that the manpower to do maintenance is available. The current system whereby all the load and cost falls on a few is unsustainable.