I've seen a number of climbing vids recently showing top climbers climbing routes while having fun. What the videos leave out is the fact that another climber has climbed up first and has already had all the fun. To leave this out is understandable as having fun after someone else has had the fun isn't fun and its not the job of the video to teach that climbing should be fun.
However at the crags there seems to be an increasing number of people who now lead routes while having fun having never climbed up from the ground to have the first fun. They're obviously under the illusion that they're having fun but they're not. A climb means climbing up from the ground and being boring as sin about it - though you can downclimb at any time should you feel like you're having fun. If you climb a route after someone having fun then that is better described as a secondary category fun or fun-ish ascent (even if you have fun leading the upper part of the route).
I'm not blaming anyone here. I can see how this misunderstanding has come about. Even at a crag it may appear that good climbers are having fun. That's because usually once a climber has climbed up, had fun and downclimbed they will leave the fun in place for all of their subsequent climbing attempts that day.
For inexperienced climbers confusion on this issue is understandable. Maybe those of us with more experience need to stop being boring and encourage climbers to have fun.
Fun.
Post edited at 22:30