In reply to UKC Articles:
Ugh! Ok, so some of these might be nit-picking but every one hit me straight away when watching this and I'm kinda surprised that nobody who did the editing thought "must go back and fix/add that".
Chronologically:
- Does active need moving parts? I always thought that a tricam or a hex placed in a cammed position was an active placement, maybe I'm wrong.
- You should never place a cam in the full open position indicated at the start of the video (unless its a passive placement), this is referred to when placing the red cam but starting off with "this yellow cam would be save from fully cammed to about 1/3 camed" would have been much better.
- The ideal placement is over-cammed to hell, not middle of the range! Safety first, I don't care if my second curses me the entire way up the pitch. During my climbing career, I have noticed a direct correlation between years of experience climbing and degree of overcamming when placing pro.
- There is no mention that horizontal placements should usually be done with the wide apart lobes at the bottom for stabilities sake (though it is shown placed in this way).
- There is no mention of the angle of loading and consequently the angle a cam should ideally be placed at in a vertical crack.
- There is no mention of using those nice extender slings on the Dragon/Camalot device shown.
- There is only the briefest of mentions of using cams in non-parallel sided cracks. An in depth discussion of camming angles of different devices vs increasingly flared cracks might be a bit above and beyond but a simple demo of marginal placements in flared cracks and completely failing placements in very flared cracks would have only taken a few seconds.
- Similarly, it would have been nice to show that a 4 lobe cam can still work with one lobe sticking out of the crack.
- A mention of increased force on rock over a passive placement would have been good (i.e. in dubious flakes or soft rock, put in a nut instead of a cam if at all possible.)
Ok, I'm done whining now