In reply to andrewmcleod:
> Dyneema tricam weights:
> 0.5 29g
> 1.0 35g
> 1.5 49g
> 2.0 55g
> Evo tricam weights:
> 0.25 17g
> 0.5 29g
> 1.0 37g
> 1.5 57g
> The equivalent Evo tricams are, at most, up to 2g heavier than the Dyneema tricams - given that the Dyneema tricams only have 2 placements instead of 3 (not that I've ever actually placed them that way) I'm not really sure what the point of them is.
Nothing to do with weight.
It's partially strength (I believe the dyneema ones tip out stronger), and the heads are anodized and thus look very pretty.
But you're right re the placement options, and it is upsetting that both can't be had in one unit.
Post edited at 17:34