a set of totem basics from the smallest to Camalot size 0.5
a set of hybrid totem basics from the smallest to Camalot size 0.5
a set of camalot c4s from 0.5 to 4
camalot ultralights from 0.5 to 4
wc friends 5 & 6
All would be totems - their holding power in slick rock (like UK limestone) is second to none.
They have other benefits such as being extremely flexible, being light and having the ability to load on two lobes, but the above reason makes them functionally far better than any other cam for UK climbing, in my opinion.
Full range of Totems, then C4s and X4s for the ranges that Totem cams don't cover, plus a C3 000.
The twin axle on cams like the C4s doesn't increase holding power - that principally comes from the camming angle - but it does increase the camming range.
I'm sure you realise you don't actually *need* cams to climb. If you want to replace them just because you want a matching set, fair do's, but it won't make you a better climber.
To answer the OP, quality and price. BD Camalots are my preference.
Full set of Totem cams, black to orange, blue and grey camalot ultralights above. Either BD C3 or X4 for super small. Totem cams are just awesome in my book.
A few years ago I did exactly what you are doing and replaced a miss matched set of friends. It was a complete wasteof money. I don't climb any better for it, I don't find placing gear any easier. Keep your old cams and spend the cash on a climbing trip
> Im i right in thinking the twin axel is why the BD cam seems to have better sitting power?
No, the twin cam design makes for larger expansion range, not improving holding power. The holding power is a function of the cam angel and the cam alloy. The cam angel determines the force exerted towards the rock and thereby applying friction. Friction is also determined by the alloy; the softer the more holding power.
> i like having odd cams. They all go in slightly differently and sometimes you find that one just seems to sit a bit better than another.
That's true... but mainly a factor on small cams, ie. smaller than wide fingers (~BD C4 0.5 size). And hybrid cams resolve much of it (in the smaller sizes).
well its a combination of not knowing the cams I own history I bought them 2nd and 3rd hand and the fact someone of them are starting to show there age with wear .
I never implied they would make me a better climber , I just feel I like using a particular cam style over the others and wanted to know other peoples opinions
I use dragons size 1-5 and totem basics below that (yellow, green and blue) and a black fixe alien I got from Alpkit. They're the only set I've ever had but have worked brilliant for me.
As others have said, totems are a step up in terms of technology. I would recommend totems in the smaller sizes. It's worth trying those before you go buying the smaller camelots otherwise you might find yourself buying twice!
I've done exactly that recently, replacing a mismatched rack of 4CUs in two different colour schemes, and the choice was easy: Totems in the small sizes up to red, and Dragons thereafter. The orange Totem wasn't available when I bought the gold Dragon, but I think I'd still rather have the Dragon in that size than the Totem. The larger Totems an be frustratingly flexible.
The Totems are by far the best design of cam I've ever used.
Totems in all the available sizes, then either C4s or the neww Friends outside of that. As much as I love DMM, C4s and the new Friends are far nicer to use.