In reply to Rampikino:
> What is so thoroughly depressing is the discovery that all those so-called cardboard cups that people get coffee in are simply not recyclable. Yet there doesn't seem to have been any kind of fuss made about this. We throw away millions of them every week and they go in landfill.
> A pack of apples, wrapped up in plastic, set on a polystyrene base, all for about £1.50 and generating more landfill. Crazy.
I see France and Germany are legislating that such products should be wrapped with biodegradable plastic, which is a step in the right direction.
I think a proper solution would be more holistic. My idea is that the cost of 'decommissioning' something should be there up front (more or less, or perhaps less stringently - a kind of insurance). This I think should apply to everything - e.g. nuclear reactors, fuel (how much is it going to cost to capture that CO2/NOx and put it into an inert form?), plastic (that shitty plastic that costs 1p to make - it will cost 20p to return to raw materials), food (i.e. most vegetables have practically zero decommissioning cost), smartphones (oh boy, huge cost increase - but that's good. Less frivolous usages (nobody
needs that much computing power to look at messages and play fruit games. This places the burden on the manufacturer (where it belongs), and incentivizes them to develop ways to reduce decommissioning cost. The effect is that consumers pay the real cost of an item, which I'm confident will favor so-called 'eco' products in almost every case.
Of course this idea is pie in the sky, many details lacking, but I think it's a good vision.
But, I don't think governments will change or align quick enough. I think individuals need to act and drive the change. I'm wondering why so few people act but can whole heartedly acknowledge that they should? Is it because people think on a very deep level that if we're all doing something, then it must be okay [to waste plastic]?