In reply to bpmclimb:
> Well, I know sometimes the truth of a matter can be counter-intuitive. But (after further consideration), I don't think this qualifies. In fact I'm sure it doesn't. One could similarly argue for retaining the route name "Great! More Young Children to Fiddle With" by trying to claim that all the ensuing howls of protest came from closet paedophiles.
If, during the 2010's your ludicrous and quite idiotic example of "Great! More Young Children to Fiddle With" was a common term, acceptable in society, you may have a point. A more pertinent example would be if someone were to name a climb "The Savile Feeling" these days, then you may have a point.
Except there is that climb at Hound Tor. So you'd best campaign to have it changed, and then w e can out the closet pedophiles who want it kept.
> Well, you're wrong about that, because some of them at least undoubtedly do.
Who wishes to retain the name due to "racism"? Come on, out them, let's see how many you can name.
You cannot name any can you, they are just a figment of your SJW fantasies.
> Racism exists in our society, and the climbing world is not somehow miraculously free from it.
Gasp, what blinding insight!
> If I were looking for signs of racist tendencies, being comfortable with and wanting to retain racist names would be on the radar.
You extrapolate to far, but don't let me interfere with your fantasies.
> You imply exactly the reverse, that being offended by and wanting to change those names is the more sinister indicator. That's simply ludicrous!
Again, you extrapolate to far. I hope your virtue is well and truly signaled now, and you can clean up your mess.