UKC

Well, who's the worst? What would it hold for the world if they started arguing with each other?
Has the hair got anything to do with it?

Be afraid...

In reply to FesteringSore:
Trump Rong Un.

In reply to FesteringSore:

Perhaps we'll have enough threads about Trump one day soon?

In reply to Greasy Prusiks:


very unlikely because he gives us something new and even more outrageous every day.

In reply to FesteringSore:

I don't think Trump has ever been accused of executing or assassinating family members, cheating them and cheating on them obviously, but not killing.

In reply to The New NickB:

No, but given different circumstances I think he would. The "Your're fired" approach to management is really just the "you're executed" approach tempered by law. Similarly I suspect today's more ruthless politicians - Thatcher, Blair - would in another age have been chopping heads off. (Don't think Corbyn would have lasted long in such times).

In reply to FesteringSore:

Both are clowns but there are at least some sensible heads to keep Trump in check. Kim Jong Un has free reign and any questioning him are despatched in some manner worthy of a Bond villain.

In reply to MG:
In different circumstances he might, but he hasn't. His attitude towards the Central Park Five suggests that he might have a liking for extra-judicial execution, but Kim Jong Un is definately the really deal.

In reply to FesteringSore:

Kim Jong Un is the worst. He's a socialist!

In reply to barrow_matt:


He seems quite antisocialist to me.