In reply to stp:
Excerpt from UKC Interview by Bjorn Pohl with Megos (Nov 16) which pretty much captures, with some prescience, what has been raised here:
"Pohl: The question is really where we draw the line between free climbing and aid
Megos: Kneepads were definitely more considered cheating a few year[s] back
Actually to be VERY correct, we are all aid climbing. Chalk and shoes are aid aren't they? They are just accepted by us to be ok.
Pohl: So we accept some development to a certain point, but this point keeps moving slowly?
Megos: Yes exactly. That's what I think at least. Everything improves, more gadgets will be found. It will be accepted by the community and there we go.
Pohl: Is this a problem you think?
Megos: It's only a problem if you make it one. I think everybody has to draw his own line to what he thinks is still acceptable for himself.
I for example just don't like to use kneepads. I just don't feel good doing it. And I would never do it if the first ascender didn't use one. If the first ascender did use one then I would try to do it without, or just leave it.
Till the day where I get too desperate maybe..."
Of course the Ondra project is so futuristic, the man such an inspiration and that 'resting point' so mind-boggling that my discussion point is off original topic. In terms of how practice by those operating out on the envelope percolate down into mainstream use, that Megos' statement of personal ethics had resonance for me. It definitely did dissuade me from investing in a knee pad to bring closer to my reach some of my own punterish ambitions with less effort.