In reply to bearman68:
> I find it difficult to see the attraction, or environmental credentials of electric cars. Too many rare and exotic materials used in the batteries, too much demand placed on a creaking electrical supply infrastructure, and simply not practical enough / good enough for the majority of users. Even in the event of personal transport becoming electric, the diesel engine still takes the brunt of the work of lorries, ships, tractors and other heavy duty load. This is a load I cannot see being effectively replaced with a battery.
'Rare exotic materials' are used in all sorts of everyday things, our mobile phones are causing new mining rushes around the world that will in time be recognised as harmful. Off the top of my head I can't think think what in modern Lithium batteries it is specifically you're concerned about, perhaps Cobalt which isn't so much rare as rather unfortunately all sourced from one war torn country.
As for the other big consumers of hydrocarbon fuel, I don't see their existence as a reason not to embrace battery electric power where it works, nor do I see them all as intrinsically incapable of being moved off fossil fuel.
Shipping is the hardest to clean up, the amount of energy consumed is high and the fuel carbon and sulpher rich (ironically that atmospheric sulpher may be keeping us cool) but we'd need short memories indeed to forget fossil fueled shipping is only ~150years old. Eliminating fossil fuel entirely from shipping probably requires a synthetic chemical fuel. I suspect the best we can hope for from shipping is improved hydrodynamics, cleverer routing, cleaner fossil fuel and hybridisation with sail and solar to cut consumption in the medium term. Maybe nuclear power for the biggest ships. At least the biggest ships have a short service life typically of 2-3 decades, new and newly affordable technology feeds in quickly.
Trucks are troublesome they are energy hungry but the aerodynamics are the obvious starting point, current designs are awful, streamline them then form them up into computer controlled convoys then use them to get freight onto rails. Gas-electric hybrids would be my short-medium term bet for 'clean' trucking, longer term I suspect they will go battery electric but it will require a new generation of energy dense fast-charging batteries or perhaps natural gas fuel cells.
Tractors and other agricultural machines have a very odd duty cycle, they generally do nothing for months then get flogged at full power 24-7 for few weeks a few times a year. Diesel makes sense, I don't see that changing except in time we may cut the fossil content of the diesel down in exchange for synthetic components. Soil depletion and dependence on synthetic fertiliser is the bigger problem to solve in agriculture.
> If there is an alternative it has to be hydrogen... Even though we must currently use fossil fuels to make hydrogen, its ability not not generated Co2 must be a huge advantage.
Fossil fuel derived Hydrogen does release CO2 but in its refining, not its use. H2 energy density is woeful, it's difficult to handle/store in cryogenic form, embrittles metal and is hazardous in storage/transport/use due to it's propensity to leak, very low ignition energy and the fact it will burn in just about any mixture ratio with oxygen.
> In the longer term hydrogen should be able to be produced by using water. Imagine if we were to use solar and sea water to generate large scale hydrogen in sub Saharan Africa...
GM (or carefully selected) organisms manufacturing our fuels, medicines and industrial chemicals from basic organic feedstock with minimal solar energy input may well be the future but it's a long way in the future for now.
jk
Post edited at 09:56