In reply to GregCHF:
> Are you saying that no one ever makes mistakes in there job? You must be bloody good at yours.
There's making mistakes, and then there's making stuff up, I think you'll agree there's a difference.
> I also think that comparing analysis on a story you don't like, to the illegal phone tapping of vulnerable people is a massive extrapolation that does not align. If she had done something illegal, she would not still have her job. You are using an unrelated emotive issue to try and win argument, that is not a valid position.
I'm not suggesting the two things are similar in legality, I'm suggesting that apologising after the fact, in both these cases, doesn't make it right.
I mentioned this "one" story because I was replying to the second post in the thread (remember the one you wrote - the one mentioning Kunessburg). I have plenty of other examples of BBC bias, especially in relation to Palestine (which is when I first became aware of it). This just happened to be the one mentioned in the thread when I read it, and to be honest you we the one who first brought it up!!
I realise that Kunessburg is the darling of the Tories, but that doesn't mean she honest.
Post edited at 14:22