In reply to summo:
> No. But the person referenced 'real residents'. So you must have to live reasonably close to be considered a resident. You couldn't say someone living in Carlisle was a local resident could you?
> It shows that anyone working in the lakes can't afford to buy a house within the distance a scream would travel from the zip wire.
> I didn't actual say it was a good or bad place for it. But if you think the houses within miles of there are owned by locals, who travel just a few miles to work, then you are dreaming.
And the day that real has a "test"attached to it the planning system needs to change big time. For a start how about the real "test" being applied to the planning officers?
The houses directly affected by the application are few, maybe 12 or so if you include Thirlspot, upper St John's, maybe even Dale Bottom. But there are still plenty of real residents in Keswick who should also have a say.
Me, I don't live there. I have an opinion but not a say.