In reply to wintertree:
> I find the storey as told doesn’t ring true - a document to “persons unknown” is not and can not be a summons, and as it was not addressed to your friend, she did not get it. She found it in her house - it was not sent to her.
> You say that a judge “threw it out”. But what do you mean by “it”? Presumably not a court case because that can’t exist for “persons unknown”. So do you mean that the Jude threw the summons out? What exactly was the not-actually-a-summons thrown out of? Why was a judge looking at it?
> Perhaps I am wrong - won’t be the last time - but the event you describe seems nonsensical. Are you lacking a complete description of what happened from your friend, or have you passed on an incomplete description here?
I've calmed down now I've had a bath.
What's happened, is, when tree protesters in Sheffield started to have their pictures taken, they started to wear disguises, simply from not liking not knowing why their pictures were being taken, due to not being told why - even if it is legal to take pictures of people in public. Following this, a blanket injunction was served, banning anybody from entering a work zone, which meant that protesters continued to disguise their identities when entering work zones to prevent the felling of healthy trees.
When she entered the inadequately secured work zone, my friend was wearing a disguise, and so wasn't identifiable to anybody there who would have been recording events on behalf of AMEY/Sheffield City Council. She left where she'd been protesting and went home, and before being contacted more formally/officially by name, had a piece of paper through her door addressed to 'persons unknown', telling her that she'd breached the injunction and was due in court. Whether what she got through her door had any legal weight, or whether it was something produced by another party to let her know she'd 'been found out', I'm not clear, but following receiving this piece of paper through her door, she was officially summoned to court by name, along with 9 or 11 other people.
None of them were sent to jail, some of them were charged with court/legal fees, and my friend had her charges looked at by the judge (events being recorded by both 'sides' proved the work zone wasn't properly secured), who decided she'd not broken any kind of injunction at all against entering work zones around the trunks of trees, which happily meant that was the end of things for her. That whoever put the piece of paper through her door, didn't know who she was, and that it was posted through her door shortly after she got home, makes her think that she was followed home by somebody, a person unknown to her working on behalf of AMEY/Sheffield City Council.
Edit: Basically, everything possible is being tried to stop people from preventing healthy trees for which engineering work-arounds can be found from being felled, and this is just one part of it.
Post edited at 20:23