Are Cyclists Suckers ?
And I'm not refering to 'wheel suckers' that's a debate for another day
Leaving aside the cost of the bikes themselves, I never cease to be amazed at the price of cycling clothing / accessories, I can appreciate that a lot of design has gone into creating these products and many of them are well thought out and very useful but the pricing of some (I would go as far as to say 'most') of these products are just insane. It would seem that by adding the word 'cycling' as a pronoun to a product effectively tripples the cost of the product, say, you can purchase a pair of socks costing £x or, the same pair of socks branded as 'cycling' socks sells for 3£x and so on.
I appreciate that cycling is trendy and linked with the mid life crisis brigade, for whom money is of no consequence when compared to a 'label'. I also appreciate that coming from a stingey climbing background the thought of spending a small fortune on what are essentially disposible items seems bonkers but who am I to tell people to do with their own money ?
We all like to emulate our hero's to some degree and one of the nice things about climbing is that even the lowliest of bumblies (such as myself) can buy the very same equipment as world champions / leading edge(sic) climbers, at pretty reasonable prices, I'm fairly sure the same can not be said of cycling.
I know a lot of you will counter with the fact that you only ever cycle in your grandad's string vest and school plimsoles but you only have to go out on the road to see that this is not the norm.
When a cycling jersey could cost almost as much as a jacket that will take you to the top of Everest I cant help feeling that there are a lot of suckers in the cycling world.
I was going to don my asbestos underpants but I spent all my money on these beauties :-
http://www.triathlete.com/2013/09/gear-tech/the-519-cycling-short-why-assos...