In reply to Will bosi:
I've seen the article has now been edited to show Hubble as a possible which I thought was fairer.
I didn't think there was a consensus yet but perhaps there is enough of one now.
I can remember Megos said it probably wasn't 9a. That interview was actually embarrassing for me to read because it was almost like they kept asking "is it 9a?" And he clearly thought it wasn't but didn't want to upset the doey eyed UKC team.
This is where my original comment comes from, because since UKC boldy said it was 9a "cos Ondra said" and wanted to re write the history of climbing, I felt like it's become 9a because it makes a better headline.
Thank you for your view on the grade, I'm not trying to knock your opinion or achievement. You've actually climbed the thing and other 9a's so your view is worth a lot more than mine who's just read some tat on the internet!