In reply to Rob Dyer, BMC:
Hi Rob, thanks for responding. I appreciate that, once you've taken professional advice and the spectre of third party liability is raised, your hands are tied. It's one of the disadvantages of being the landowner. However, given the previous history of reckless defoliation, I think more care might have been taken to publicise this ahead of time.
Considering the wildlife implications, I think it would be far better to leave the remaining logs in a stack on site, rather than having them tidily removed. Maybe not exactly in their current position, but they would provide valuable cover for years to come, and as they rot, habitat for wood-boring insects and saprophytes. In any event, they will take some moving without the right equipment.
I didn't go along the top of the crag, so I haven't seen which sycamore was cut down at the top. I do know that the cable along the top wasn't doing the trees there any good.
Ironically, I was trying to follow the line of Deceptor (purely as a puerile completist) and ended up climbing up the now rather hollow and spooky poisoned stump of one the trees killed in the last round of gardening. There's certainly a public safety issue developing there!