In reply to UKC News:
At one point in my life I worked at Aboriginal Affairs Victoria. I was there for 'Sorry Day' in 2007, which was pretty moving. That's by the by.
The only logical explanation I can come up with for this is that climbers are collateral damage in a political power struggle/rebalancing between the indigenous population and the migrants.
The idea that because a site was a quarry and that 'stone scatter' should be preserved untouched seems a bit ludicrous frankly. In my city I recently wandered past a building site to see an entire medieval street plan excavated, much as I would have loved for it to have been preserved it was documented and then concreted over. It's 'progress' I guess.
I also recently biked to Stonehenge which could be considered 'sacred' for me. Couldn't get with about 100 metres of it without paying for a tour. I guess that's 'progress' too.
Just some random thoughts. I'm really sorry for everyone who has been affected by this, not least the indigenous people who probably would much rather that no one else had ever discovered Australia.