In reply to JohnBson:
> Shame can be a good way to encourage people to make better decisions...
The idea that a climber would change a behavior or protocol for fear of some possible post-mortem shaming is, to me, hilarious. Sure doesn't apply to anyone I know; your crowd must be of a very different sort.
But here's a reality. No matter how mundane or heroic your accomplishments, if you eff up and die you're a dummy---it comes with the territory and everyone knows it, which is another reason not to promote piling on after the fact.
The "respect" I mentioned has nothing to do with the preservation of reputations in some field or other. It has to do with a long-standing sense that common decency counsels restraint in the treatment of an extinguished life. And nothing about that prevents people from from analyzing, discussing, and learning from accidents. Separating memorials from analysis treats the deceased with the dignity they deserve as humans without depriving anyone of even a shred of the lessons that might be extracted from the misfortune.