In reply to johncoxmysteriously:
So you'd prefer media censorship of any ascent that doesn't fit your idea of responsible? What if someone were (genuinely!) to onsight Indian Face - wouldn't that be similarly dangerous? Or is using whatever gear is available the deciding factor?
My view is that it's all climbing. Climbing necessarily involves danger and personally deciding upon an acceptable level of risk. Some will reduce risk by sportclimbing, some by leading only well-protectable trad routes, some by leading only easy scary routes. Some may only ever top-rope. Some will solo hard routes with a similarly low level of actual risk due to a level of climbing competence and judgement that others will find hard to comprehend. I say why draw the line anywhere. If climbing (trad, at least) has a common theme at all it's personal responsibility and risk management. We don't need the media to be telling us what is and isn't reasonable.