In reply to Removed User:
> (In reply to Removed Useraln)
>
> E7 6a?
>
> I wonder how something that's 6a could get such a high E grade? Makes me wonder whether we should just have E1 to E5 for any route, regardless of technical grade, E1 being unsustained and well protected, E5 being sustained at the technical grade and with no protection and a death fall.
>
Sustained 6a climbing with groundfall potential sounds like sensible grading to me. Why does the grading of this route warrent changing the grading system to something much worse? The grade E7 6a tells you all that you need to know in my opinion.