UKC

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com: haha, yeah but there were no mats or spotters!

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com: I think the question is.....was this a flashed attempt, or did he work it beofre hand? Mabye previoulsy top ropped? who knows, this may have an effect on the propossed grade of liam's "V6" highball may i add.

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Yea, first of all i dont think we can claim this as an onsight. Wiskers clearly had prior knowledge of the route.

Second, please can we not talk about grade until its repeated. I dont think it bears repeating but grade is determined by consensus. Lets not get ahead of ourselves.

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Link Fail

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

another fantastic bit of 'news' from ukc!

Haa this is shama's pet cat . . . .

Strong indeed! Good effort !

Just goes to show that anyone can get strong with the new training techniques available nowadays . . . . . .

In reply to vincentvega: i thought it was great.. really inspirational. In fact i'm going to train (my cat) harder now.

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Surely this would count as a form of mixed climbing?

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Link to Moon climbing is missing a leading 'h' (as 'ttp' is not a registered protocol, at least in my browser).

In reply to slacky:

sorted..ta

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Ha! Excellent - I love the way (s)he hangs it before starting to campus.

Is nobody going to make the cam-puss joke?

In reply to Serpico: You mean, otherthanin the very first post by Sutty?

In reply to Richard Bradley: Imustgetthisspacebarfixed!

In reply to Serpico:

Oh alright then: looks like purr-fect cam-pussing technique.

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

thought steps were reforming then! hopes dashed...

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:
THat is brilliant.
James :P

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Sorry, but it just wouldn't be UKC if I didn't point you have a glaring misspelling in that report.

"two current benchmarks seam to be 1-4-7 or if your unbelievably strong 1-5-9"

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Can someone let moonclimbing know that their "USA" version of the site doesn't work in certain sections?

In reply to snoop6060:

or the glaring poor grammer

"you can use less paw movements"

In reply to The Mole:

apologies ....Laddering text C+P'ed from the Moon site...and posted late at night

In reply to sutty:

If it's not registered then it will be in fur trouble.

In reply to The Mole:


I assume that's inoric...

In reply to Mick Ryan - UKClimbing.com:

Yeah, but what's it ever done on grit?

In reply to gritstoner:

Congratulations.

In reply to vincentvega:

Oh c'mon, that was brilliant.