In reply to Removed UserClimberSteve:
> Thanks for your reply. I was thinking a freestanding structure, but haven't put to much thought into the design yet. I don't think I'd want to be attaching anything to the walls. Although that looks like it would probably be the better option in terms of amount of wood needed and spread of the weight.
A climbing surface completely supported by the house doesn't need to be screwed to it. You can easily use the floor and the house wall facing the climbing surface rather than the wall behind it for support.
In it's simplest form consider a single supporting upright behind the climbing surface: rising diagonally at say 30deg over vertical from skirting board to ceiling. That bolts to a second timber, touching and parallel to the ceiling spanning the whole room (perpendicular to the wall behind your climbing surface, not parallel). Once a couple (or more) of those are locked together by the climbing surface so they can't fall sideways that's completely locked in place with just that single bolt per frame, no fixings to the room (and it can be padded at contact points to protect the finish).
Also remember home climbing walls don't need to be massively stiff, most people hugely overbuild them resulting in needlessly heavy and expensive structures.
One thing to be wary of, particularly upstairs, is that the top course or two of bricks in a wall often isn't that stable and walls are strongest, most resistant to being pushed or pulled down in the corners where they lock into other walls. Most of this only matters where the building is shoddy or degraded or your climbing wall is absurdly designed.
jk