Scarpa Golden Gate Kima RT - brilliant, apart from the bad bits Review

© UKC Gear

When I first saw the Golden Gate Kima RT, a mountain running shoe with a carbon plate, my interest was piqued. You may have heard about how carbon plates have revolutionised the world of road running, but I was curious to see how this might work in an off-road environment. Could it make me more like Eliud Kipchoge? The end result wasn't quite what I'd expected, and took a little time to appreciate, but the promised fatigue-reducing benefits were definitely there. However, there's a catch - a fairly big one in this case - and that's the durability of the rest of the shoe. Whilst in the process of writing this review I've managed to destroy not just one, but two pairs, and for most buyers I suspect that failure will unfortunately outweigh any of the positives.

I really like the Kima RT, and if it weren't for the problems I'd continue to use them as my primary shoe

What's with the carbon plate?

In between layers of cushioning in the sole, Scarpa have sandwiched a 1mm carbon plate. Placed at the points that benefit from the most support - the heel and midfoot - this layer is supposed to heighten the elastic response in the arch of the foot, which in turn is said to reduce the physical effort of running. So...?

In Use

When I first put on the Kima RTs I was expecting something that artificially propelled me forwards at a pace previously unimagined. Maybe my expectations were a little unrealistic, as this didn't happen, but the difference became more noticeable the longer I ran. It was most noticeable throughout the 2022 Cheviot Goat, where I got to the end of the 55(ish) mile course with my feet feeling absolutely fresh, with none of the foot fatigue I often experience after long runs. However, there was another surprise at the end of the race, which was that I'd completely worn through the mesh on the inside of each shoe.

My first pair of Kima RT   © UKC Gear
My first pair of Kima RT
© UKC Gear

My second pair of Kima RT   © UKC Gear
My second pair of Kima RT
© UKC Gear

It's worth contextualising this use, and highlighting what these shoes are designed for, because I think that's important to ascertain before casting judgement.

The shoe itself is named after Trofeo Kima, which is pretty much the Skyrunning benchmark, a discipline renowned for its technical and rocky terrain. Scarpa themselves say that it's designed - and tested - for "the most technical trails, but also less demanding unpaved tracks". What's absent in this description is what we have a lot of here in the UK, which is miles and miles of bog, heather and tussock - and that's pretty much what I used to test them out on. What I would say though is that if a shoe's uppers (in particular) can't handle some heather then there's no way they're going to handle a whole load of sharp rocks.

What makes me most curious is how little this has been mentioned within other reviews published elsewhere, when it took me a comparatively short space of time to get through two pairs. The first pair lasted 150 miles, the second barely 50 - albeit on extremely rough terrain. If you were using these on well manicured trails I think there's the possibility you'd get away with it, but seeing how quickly they've worn for me makes me wonder if they'd scuff simply from general usage.

Perhaps the greatest irony and annoyance is that in spite of these problems I've really liked the Kima RT, and if durability wasn't an issue then I'd continue to use them as my primary shoe. They perform well both on and off trail, with a good amount of grip, a decent amount of tread, and a nice, grippy sole. The Presa sole is definitely at the sticky end of the spectrum, but not so much so that it wears out too quickly. It's great on rock, both dry and wet. On wet, vegetated terrain the shoe handles remarkably well and whilst it isn't a mud specialist (i.e. Mudclaw) it does alright. In many ways I'd say it's a superb all-rounder, capable of doing a bit of everything, although favouring longer distances simply through the support its carbon plate provides. There are a few caveats to this though, namely that some might find it a little too stiff. I'd wondered about whether it would feel 'tippy' as a result of the carbon plate, but didn't have an issue with this either. Perhaps this aspect will come down to personal preference.


The Kima RT has quite a broad fit across the forefoot, which gives the foot plenty of space to spread during long runs, but tapers towards the toe. As always, we recommend trying before you buy, because this will work for some people and not others. At the back end, it features a fairly narrow heel, which helps to keep your foot cemented in place.

When it comes to sizing I had to go up a 1/2 size to get the right length. Much like other Scarpa models, they aren't available in half sizes, so you've got to get lucky with sizing, because if you're not you'll be stuck somewhere in between the European sizes, which are 3/4 UK sizes - and hence make quite a difference.

The Kima RT features a 6mm drop, with a low stack height of 22mm heel and 17mm forefoot, which partly accounts for why it's so good on technical terrain, as you're really close to the ground (especially for a shoe that offers this level of support).

Footbeds tend to be cheap and floppy, but this wins some sort of prize  © UKH/UKC Gear
Footbeds tend to be cheap and floppy, but this wins some sort of prize
© UKH/UKC Gear


Another big letdown with this shoe is its footbed. Considering the shoe's price tag of £200 you'd expect high quality components throughout, but the footbed is as cheap as they come. Over the space of a single long run I found it had warped and moved within the bottom of the shoe, creating ridge lines which easily could have led to blisters. From this point on it was permanently out of shape, and hard to fit back inside the shoe, and whilst it eventually reached a point where it would stay in place it is still far from ideal. You might want to replace the generic flimsy insole with something a bit more sturdy and comfy.


Ultimately the issues I've had regarding durability of the Golden Gate Kima RT are too great to ignore, especially given the upper end price tag, and I couldn't recommend buying a pair in light of this, unless you're using them on extremely well-manicured trails. This is a shame, because they're actually a really good shoe to run in and one that I'd like to have used a lot more. Despite not being as dramatic as I'd at first dreamed, I found that the carbon insert does make a difference over long distances, albeit the gains are going to be relatively marginal. My hope is that Scarpa take this feedback on board, tweak the materials used throughout the uppers, include a high quality footbed, and come back with something that could be pretty unbeatable. It's certainly got the potential.

For more information

Support UKC

As climbers we strive to make UKClimbing the kind of website we would love to visit, with the most up-to-date news, diverse and interesting articles, comprehensive gear reviews, breathtaking photographs and a vast and useful logbook system. As a result, an incredible community has formed around the site - we’ve provided the framework but it’s you who make the website what it is today. If you appreciate the content we offer then you can help us by becoming an official UKC Supporter. This can be a one-off single annual payment or a more substantial payment paid monthly or yearly which includes full access to Rockfax Digital and discounts on Rockfax print publications.

If you appreciate UKClimbing then please help us by becoming a UKC Supporter.

UKC Supporter

  • Support the website we all know and love
  • Access to a year's subscription to Rockfax Digital.
  • Plus 30% off Rockfax guidebooks
  • Plus Show your support - UKC Supporter badge on your profile and forum posts
UKC/UKH/Rockfax logo

24 May

£4/mile does seem pretty steep 😂

24 May

Oof, I'll them a miss thanks Scarpa (and I speak as someone with 5 pairs of Scarpa rock shoes on rotation). 50 miles would get you round a longish training run and the Kima itself. Customer or beta tester? Shame.

24 May

A hard overlay against mesh just scissors the mesh on the flex point, see so many shoes that have this obvious flaw, probably fine on trails but do a lot of up hill in the Lakes or Peak and this is the result, not just limited to Scarpa unfortunatley

25 May

Totally agree on this,, I'm a great fan of the Sportiva mutants but for the holes that always appear at flex point long before the tread wears out :(

I've had the Scapra Spin Ultras and though I may have got a few more miles in them the same thing has happened to these as well.

25 May

Oof. Sounds like I dodged a bullet. I sold my pair as they were a touch too small and gave me blisters across the toes. I didn’t like the stiffness either and they felt tippy to me on rocky trails. I replaced them with the Hoka Tecton X which also has a carbon plate but feels a lot more flexible. I mainly use them on non technical trails and after 500Km I’m not convinced that a carbon plate does much in a trail shoe (apart from increase the price tag).

Why have Scarpa not nailed trail shoes yet given their climbing shoes and mountain boots are so incredibly good and durable?

Hoka seem to make brilliant uppers that never split or wear out (the Matryx fabric is really durable) but annoyingly their midsoles don’t last.

More Comments

Loading Notifications...
Facebook Twitter Copy Email