UKC Logbook - 'Jim's Slopes'

Rockfax Description
An eliminate but worthwhile. More awkward than it looks. © Rockfax

User	Date		Notes
harrison	16 Jun, 2021	Show βeta βeta: There is a direct line to this around f6C/+ (I'd call it Jim's Slopes Direct) which is what the rockfax topo shows, a few people have done it and suggested 6c-7a. Thought I added it on here but has disappeared.	βeta?
Show beta βeta: There is a direct line to this around f6C/+ (I'd call it Jim's Slopes Direct) which is what the rockfax topo shows, a few people have done it and suggested 6c-7a. Thought I added it on here but has disappeared.
harrison	1 Feb, 2020	Show βeta βeta: Start on the pock & R sloper (or both slopers), start RF on pock in middle, smear left foot high left on ramp, knee scum, lock it in, LH to sloper on top of boulder, don’t fall off the mantle. Easily V3 (f6A+) for me - very hard to reach the top from the knee scum.
Show beta βeta: Start on the pock & R sloper (or both slopers), start RF on pock in middle, smear left foot high left on ramp, knee scum, lock it in, LH to sloper on top of boulder, don’t fall off the mantle. Easily V3 (f6A+) for me - very hard to reach the top from the knee scum.
harrison	22 May, 2019	Show βeta βeta: Very hard to exit directly - either the topo, description or grade is wrong. V5 minimum if you follow the topo line and don't stray to adjacent problems.	βeta?
Show beta βeta: Very hard to exit directly - either the topo, description or grade is wrong. V5 minimum if you follow the topo line and don't stray to adjacent problems.