UKC

Climbing ethics: Listed viaduct/bridge

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
 AwfulSlothful 06 May 2023

I have found a viaduct near by to me where I can practice boulder typer problems and lateral traverses. However it is a listed building, I have had a look online and the only thing I can find that is similar is new mills tora but that's a bolted established route. Are there ethics against what I am doing or rules to follow like leave no trace by cleaning any chalk residue? Any opinions or advice welcome, only been climbing 1 year and this is the first outdoor climbing.

 Lankyman 06 May 2023
In reply to AwfulSlothful:

You should be OK so long as you're not harming the fabric by kicking hell out of it or chipping holds/mortar etc. They were built to carry trains so they're pretty tough structures. I've swanned around on a few viaducts in the past and it never occurred to me whether or not they were listed although undoubtedly they were (eg the awesome Ribblehead Viaduct).

 profitofdoom 06 May 2023
In reply to AwfulSlothful:

> I have found a viaduct near by to me where I can practice boulder typer problems and lateral traverses. However it is a listed building......

I pulled off a chunk of a 2000-year old wall in Palmyra Syria (don't ask) while bouldering on it in the 1970s. I am claiming a record. I crashed to the ground, damaging my leg and had to go to a hospital with it back in Damascus 

Not my finest hour

1
 Howard J 06 May 2023
In reply to AwfulSlothful:

The viaduct is owned by someone, and just like climbing on a natural feature they may have concerns about their own potential liability if you were to be injured. A "leave no trace" approach and not drawing attention to yourself is therefore a sensible as well as an ethical approach.

Obviously you should avoid causing any damage, and fixing anchors of any kind is a no-no.


New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...