In reply to FreshSlate:
> Fair arguments.
but not entirely unflawed
> 1) It suggests a mutual benefit from trade, which is fine. Export the things you can make well/cheap and import what you find expensive/hard to produce. This is fine. The main thing is for companies to keep manufacturing and exporting, supporting DMM doesn't hinder that, if they're doing well, they can expand and produce for climbers world wide and if they're profiting then the workers here and the government profit. Producing products for a higher cost just for internal circulation when there are more competetive products on the global market does not make sense though, might as well rebrand something else and actually produce something profitable.
which is fine, but it rather depends upon whether you want to retain any future ability to return to that manufacturing capability: as Toby A says, Jottnar couldn't source their kit from the UK - i'm pretty sure we used to be ok at making clothes…it also tends to ignore hidden costs/benefits which translate to the bottom line - Citroen cars are quite cheap, but they're supported by the French government, Chinese workers get paid less per day than i do, european & US farming is has a fairly (or unfairly, depending on your perspective!) level of support ...
> 2) Not sure how this can be true, surely once internationally shipped, it must then arrive via local delivery.
Absolutely. Whilst international shipping is very cheap per mile, it still entails a cost both financially & environmentally
> 3) Yes, I had thought of this. Fair point, probably better than direct aid too.
Oh, for sure: now Saudi Arabia is a 'high-income economy' they've become so much more enlightened to our Western sensibilities & egalitarian moral stance. Oh.
The final point rather depends upon how much political/social influence the market really has - probably a lot eventually, but it takes time. Given some people will still be happy to buy a trainer (insert consumer item of your choice) because it's sooo much cooler than last year's (which they also bought) and cheap they are ok with the fact it was made by a 4 year-old.
ultimately, if i can find a British (or European) made product that is of good quality then i'm happy to pay a bit more for it: if someone in North Wales has more money in their pocket, they're more likely to be able to afford my services (contract killing) which makes me happy
A lot of our kit tends to have a pretty long half-life (my Mountain Technology mountaineering axe will outlast my kids, i'm sure) and as someone above said if a product lasts 10 years, then the extra cost per year/week/day is fairly minimal
lardbrain