In reply to gethin_allen:
> proflex with their lumps of plastic masquerading as suspension and things like the girvin flex system stems and plus four parallelagram forks), that's why I only had front sus.
The yellow blobs of elastmoer! Ok in summer, rock solid in winter, lol. To be fair to Proflex though, the later 957 has non-elastomer damper (I'll refrain from calling in them shocks). I had a pair of the carbon legged parallelogram forks - they were lovely to look at and kept them for many years - eventually sold them on Ebay for £300!
>The only disk brakes I remember were the hope C2 that were really a bit rubbish and had to be fiddled with constantly.
Yep, I had some of those, they were crap; and they boiled up and quickly became useless.
> Since then I don't think there have been any massive non evolutionary changes in bikes. Things have got lighter/stronger/bigger/smaller/more powerful but all just refinements.
I'd disagree, full sus & hard tail mountain bikes have undergone a major step up in the last few years with bigger wheels, lighter frames and longer, lower and slacker geometry; and 1x drive trains, now giving 12 speed on a 10-50t cassette! ... and of course tubeless
I'd avoid hyperbole like revolutionary, but the pace of change has been very fast. The emerging range of long travel, low, slack 29ers are very cool. The next big step will be gearboxes for the masses.
Case in point: see ebdon's post at 00:19 Sat
(You could say that e-bikes are also revolutionary..., but lets not go there for now!)